FOUL PLAY: The Delhi based magazine, Caravan, carried a detailed investigative story alleging that Loya who was to pass a verdict on framing charges against BJP president Amit Shah was murdered
By Niranjan Takle
The sudden death of special judge Brijgopal Harkishan Loya of the CBI Court which was to frame charges against Amit Shah in the false encounter case has aroused much suspicion. The Caravan probe which alleges foul play has ironically being challenged by Indian Express and NDTV. Co-incidentally the judge who succeeded Loya absolved Amit Shah of all the charges in the case
ON THE morning of December 1, 2014, the family of 48-year-old judge Brijgopal Harkishan Loya, who was presiding over the Central Bureau of Investigation special court in Mumbai, was informed that he had died in Nagpur, where he had travelled for a colleague’s daughter’s wedding. Loya had been hearing one of the most high-profile cases in the country, involving the allegedly staged encounter killing of Sohrabuddin
Sheikh in 2005. The prime accused in the case was Amit Shah — Gujarat’s minister of state for home at the time of Sohrabuddin’s killing, and the Bharatiya Janata Party’s national president at the time of Loya’s death. The media reported that the judge had died of a heart attack.
Loya’s family did not speak to the media after his death. But in November 2016, Loya’s niece, Nupur Balaprasad Biyani, approached me while I was visiting Pune to say she had concerns about the circumstances surrounding her uncle’s death. Following this, over several meetings between November
2016 and November 2017, I spoke to her mother, Anuradha Biyani, who is Loya’s sister and a medical doctor in government service; another of Loya’s sisters, Sarita Mandhane; and Loya’s father, Harkishan. also tracked down and spoke to government servants in Nagpur who witnessed the procedures followed with regard to the judge’s body after his death, including the post-mortem.
From these accounts, deeply disturbing questions emerged about Loya’s death: questions about inconsistencies in the reported account of the death; about the procedures followed after his death; and about the condition of the judge’s body when it was handed over to the family. Though the family asked
for an inquiry commission to probe Loya’s death, none was ever set up.
At 11 pm on November 30, 2014, from Nagpur, Loya phoned his wife, Sharmila, using his mobile phone. Over around 40 minutes, he described to her his busy schedule through the day. Loya was in Nagpur to attend the wedding of the daughter of a fellow judge, Sapna Joshi. Initially he had not intended to
go, but two of his fellow judges had insisted that he accompany them. Loya told his wife that
he had attended the wedding, and later attended a reception. He also enquired about his son, Anuj. He said that he was staying at Ravi Bhavan, a government guest house for VIPs in Nagpur’s Civil Lines locality, along with the judges he had accompanied to Nagpur.
It was the last call that Loya is known to have made, and the last conversation that he is known to have had. His family received the news of his death early the next morning.
“His wife in Mumbai, myself in Latur city and my daughters in Dhule, Jalgaon and Aurangabad received calls,” early on the morning of December 1, 2014, Harkishan Loya, the judge’s father, told me when we first met, in November 2016, in his native village of Gategaon, near Latur city. They were informed “that
Brij passed away in the night, that his post-mortem was over and his body had been sent to our ancestral home in Gategaon, in Latur district,” he added. “I felt like an earthquake had shattered my life.”
The family was told that Loya had died of a cardiac arrest. “We were told that he had chest pain, and so was taken to Dande Hospital, a private hospital in Nagpur, by auto rickshaw, where some medication was provided,” Harkishan said. Biyani, Loya’s sister, described Dande Hospital as “an obscure place,” and said that she “later learnt that the ECG” — the electrocardiography unit at the facility — “was not working.” Later, Harkishan said, Loya “was shifted to Meditrina hospital”—another private hospital in the ci — “where he was declared dead on arrival.”
The Sohrabuddin case was the only one that Loya was hearing At the time of his death, and was one of the most carefully watched cases then underway in the country. In 2012, the Supreme Court had ordered that the trial in the case be shifted from Gujarat to Maharashtra, stating that it was “convinced that in order to
preserve the integrity of the trial it is necessary to shift it outside the State.” The Supreme Court had also ordered that the trial be heard by the same judge from start to finish. But, in violation of this order, JT Utpat, the judge who first heard the trial, was transferred from the CBI special court in mid 2014, and replaced by Loya.
On June 6, 2014, Utpat had reprimanded Amit Shah for seeking exemption from appearing in court. After Shah failed to appear on the next date, June 20, Utpat fixed a hearing for June 26. The judge was transferred on June 25. On October 31, 2014, Loya, who had allowed Shah the exemption, asked why Shah had failed to appear in court despite being in Mumbai on that date. He set the next date of hearing
for December 15.
Loya’s death on December 1 was reported only in a few routine news articles the next day, and did not attract significant media attention. The Indian Express, while reporting that Loya had “died of a heart attack” noted, “Sources close to him said that Loya had sound medical history.” The media attention picked up briefly on December 3, when MPs of the Trinamool Congress staged a protest outside the Parliament, where the winter session was under way, to demand an inquiry into Loya’s Ndeath. The next day, Sohrabuddin’s brother, Rubabuddin,M wrote a letter to the CBI, expressinghis shock at Loya’s death.
Nothing came of the MPs’ protests, or Rubabuddin’s letter. No follow-up stories appearedon the circumstances surrounding Loya’s death.
Over numerous conversations with Loya’s family members, I pieced together a chilling description of what Loya went through while presiding over the Sohrabuddin trial, and of what happened following his death.
Biyani also gave me copies of a diary she said she maintains regularly, which included entries from the days preceding and following her brother’s death. In these, she noted many aspects of the incident that disturbed her. I also reached out to Loya’s wife and son, but they declined to speak, saying that they feared
for their lives.
Biyani, who is based in Dhule, told me that she received a call on the morning of December 1, 2014 from someone identifying himself as a judge named Barde, who told her to travel to Gategaon, some 30 kilometres from Latur, where Loya’s body was sent. The same caller also informed Biyani and other members of the family that a postmortem had been conducted on the body, and that the cause of
death was a heart attack.
Loya’s father normally resides in Gategaon, but was in Latur at the time, at the house of one of his daughters. He, too, received a phone call, telling him his son’s body would be moved to Gategaon. “Ishwar Baheti, an RSS worker, had informed father that he would arrange for the body to reach Gategaon,” Biyani told me. “Nobody knows why, how and when he came to know about the death of Brij Loya.”
Sarita Mandhane, another of Loya’s sisters, who runs a tuition centre in Aurangabad and was visiting Latur at the time, told me that she received a call from Barde at around 5 am, informing her that Loya had died. “He said that Brij has passed away in Nagpur and asked us to rush to Nagpur,” she said. She set out
to pick up her nephew from a hospital in Latur where he had earlier been admitted, but “just as we were leaving the hospital, this person, Ishwar Baheti, came there. I still don’t know how he came to know that we were atM Sarda Hospital.” According to Mandhane, Baheti said that he had been talking through the
night with people in Nagpur, and insisted that there was no point in going to Nagpur since the body was being sent to Gategaon from there in an ambulance. “He took us to his house, saying that he will coordinate everything,” she said. (Questions that I sent to Baheti were still unanswered at the time this story was published.)
It was night by the time Biyani reached Gategaon—the other sisters were already at the ancestral home by then. The body was delivered at around 11.30 pm, after Biyani’s arrival, according to an entry in her diary.
To the family’s shock, none of Loya’s colleagues had accompanied his body on the journey
from Nagpur. The only person accompanying the body was the ambulance driver. “It was shocking,” Biyani said. “The two judges who had insisted that he travel to Nagpur for the marriage had not accompanied him. Mr Barde, who informed the family of his death and his postmortem, had not accompanied him. This question haunts me: why was his body not accompanied by anyone?” One of her diary entries reads, “He was a CBI court judge, he was supposed to have security and he deserved to be properly accompanied.”
Loya’s wife, Sharmila, and his daughter and son, Apurva and Anuj, travelled to Gategaon from Mumbai, accompanied by a few judges. One of them “was constantly telling Anuj and the others not to speak to anybody,” Biyani told me. “Anuj was of course sad and scared, but he maintained his poise and kept
supporting his mother.”
Biyani recounted that when she saw the body, she felt that something was amiss. “There were bloodstains on the neck at he back of the shirt,” she told me. She added that his “spectacles were below the neck.”
Mandhane told me that Loya’s spectacles were “stuck under his body.”
A diary entry by Biyani from the time reads, “There was blood on his collar. His belt was twisted in the opposite direction, and the pant clip is broken. Even my uncle feels that this is suspicious.” Harkishan told e, “There were bloodstains on the clothes.” Mandhane said that she, too, saw “blood on the neck.” She said that “there was blood an an injury on his head … on the back side,” and that “his shirt had blood spots.” Harkishan said, “His shirt had blood on it from his left shoulder to his waist.
But in the post-mortem report, issued by the Government Medical College Hospital in Nagpur, under a category described as “Condition of the clothes — whether wet with water, stained with blood or soiled
with vomit or foecal matter,” a handwritten entry reads, simply, “Dry.”
Biyani found the state of the body suspicious because, as a doctor, “I know that blood does not come out during PM” — post-mortem — “since the heart and lungs don’t function.” She said that she demanded a second post-mortem, but that Loya’s gathered friends and colleagues “discouraged us, telling us not to
complicate the issue more.”
The family was tense and scared, but was forced to carry out Loya’s funeral, Harkishan said.
Legal experts suggest that if Loya’s death was deemed suspicious — the fact that a postmortem was ordered suggests that it was — a panchnama should have been prepared, and a medico-legal case should have been filed. “As per legal procedure, the police department is expected to collect and seal all the ersonal belongings of the deceased, list them all in a panchnama and hand them over
to the family as they are,” Asim\ Sarode, a senior Pune-based lawyer old me. Biyani said the
family was not given any copy of a panchnama.
Loya’s mobile phone was returned to the family, but, Biyani said, it was returned by Baheti,
and not by the police. “We got his mobile on the third or fourth day,” she said. “I had asked for it immediately. It had information about his calls and all that happened. We would have known about it if we got it. And the SMSes. Just one or two days before this news, a message had come which said, ‘Sir, stay safe from these people.’ That SMS was on the phone. Everything was deleted from it.”
Biyani had numerous questions about the events of the night of Loya’s death and the following
morning. Among them was that of how and why Loya had been taken to hospital in an auto rickshaw, when the auto stand nearest to Ravi Bhavan is around two kilometres away from it. “There is no auto rickshaw stand near Ravi Bhavan, and people do not get auto rickshawsmear Ravi Bhavan even during the day,” Biyani said. “How did the men accompanying him manage to get n auto rickshaw at midnight?”
Other questions, too, remain unanswered. Why was the family not informed when Loya was taken to hospital? Why were they not informed as soon as he died? Why were they not asked for approval of a post-mortem, or informed that one was to be performed, before the procedure was carried out? Who recommended the post-mortem, and why? What was suspiciousabout Loya’s death to cause a post-mortem to be recommended? What medication was administered to him at Dande hospital? Was there not a single
vehicle in Ravi Bhavan — which regularly hosts VIPs, including ministers, IAS and IPS officers
and judges — available to ferry Loya to hospital? The winter session of the Maharashtra state assembly was to begin in Nagpur on December 7, and hundreds of officials usually arrive in the city well in advance of assembly sessions for the preparations. Who ere the other VIPs staying in Ravi Bhavan on November 30 and December 1? “These all are very valid questions,” Sarode, the lawyer, said. “Why was the report of the medication administered at Dande hospital not given to the family? Will the answers to these questions create problems for someone?”
Questions such as these “still keep bothering the family, friends and relatives,” Biyani said
It added to their confusion that the judges who had insisted that Loya travel to Nagpur did not visit the family for “one or one and a half months” after his death, she said. It was only then that the family heard their account of Loya’s last hours. According to Biyani, the two men told the family that Loya experienced
chest pain at around 12.30 am, that they then took him to Dande Hospital in an auto rickshaw, and that there, “he climbed the stairs himself and some medication was administered. He was taken to Meditrina hospital where he was declared dead on arrival.” Even after this, many questionswere left unanswered. “We did try to get the details of the treatment administered in Dande Hospital, but the doctors and
the staff there simply refused to divulge any details,” Biyani said. I accessed the report of Loya’s post-mortem, conducted at the Government Medical College Hospital in Nagpur. The documentraises severa questions of its own.
Every page of the postmortem report is signed by the senior police inspector of Sadar police station, Nagpur, and bysomeone who signed with the phrase “maiyatacha chulatbhau” — or the paternal cousin brother of the deceased. This latter person is supposed to have received the body after the post-mortem
examination. “I do not have any brother or paternal cousin brother in Nagpur,” Loya’s father said. “Who signed on the report is another unanswered question.”
Further, the report states that the corpse was sent from Meditrina Hospital to the Government Medical College Hospital by the itabardi police station, Nagpur, and that it was brought in by a police constable named Pankaj, of Sitabardi police station, whose badge number is 6238. It notes that the body was brought in at 10.50 am on December 1, 2014, that the post-mortem began at 10.55 am, and that it was over at
11.55 am. The report also noted that, as per the police, Loya “died on 1/12/14 at 0615 hours” after experiencing “chest pains at 0400 am.” It stated, “He was brought to Dande hospital first and then
shifted to Meditrina hospital where he was declared to be in ndead condition.” The time of death cited in the report — 6.15 am — appears incongruous, since, according to Loya’s family members, they beganeceiving calls about his death from 5 am onwards. Further, during my investigation, two sources in Nagpur’s Government Medical College and Sitabardi police station told me they had been informed of Loya’s death by midnight, and had personally seen the dead body during the night. They also said that the post-morte was done shortly after midnight. Apart from the calls that the family received, the sources’
accounts also raise serious questions about the post-mortem report’s claim that the time of death was 6.15 am.
The source at the medical college, who was privy to the postmortem examination, also told me that he knew that there had been instructions from superiors to “cut up the body as if the PM was done and stitch it up.” The report mentions “coronary artery insufficiency” as the probable cause of death. According to the renowned Mumbaibased cardiologist Hasmukh Ravat, “Usually old age, familyhistory, smoking, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, obesity, diabetes are the causes for such coronary artery insufficiency.” Biyani pointed out that none of these were applicable to her brother. “Brij was 48,” she said. “Our parents re 85 and 80 years old, and are healthy with no cardiac history. He was always a teetotaller, played table tennis for two hours a day for years, had no diabetes or blood pressure.”
Biyani told me that she found the official medical explanation for her brother’s death hard to believe. “I am a doctor myself, and Brij used to consult me even for minor complaints such as acidity or cough,” she said. “He had no cardiac history and noone from our family has it.”